
This is not a new issue, for sure. The New York Times has addressed supersize strollers, endless parenting forums argue back and forth on the issue and this week's New Yorker magazine says it all with one delectable image.
As an urban dweller, there is absolutely nothing that irks me more than the arrogant entitlement of young mothers who believe their Baby Bulldozers should share space along crowded New York sidewalks.

The first time I witnessed the phenomenon was in a Verizon Wireless store, when a whiny mammer whose cell phone was wiped out was informed she had to go to another location to fix the problem. "Well, I certainly hope my stroller will fit through the door. I could barely get through here," she snapped. The Verizon staffer was dumbfounded. I looked at him, glared at her and rolled my eyes to the heavens.
"These women have a child, and they're like, 'Look at me,' " said stand-up comedian Ophira Eisenberg, in the Times article, who refers to oversize strollers as lawnmowers. "It's like this baby is more

Unlike convenient lightweight umbrella strollers standard from the 1960s-1980s, modern-day SUV buggies measure as much as 36 inches across and cost a whopping $700.
And they continue to irk much of the free world. In New York and Washington, D.C., it is illegal to board public buses without folding strollers. Both NYC and Chicago have loosely based "Pedestrians for the Abolition of

Meanwhile, a family in Nova Scotia, Canada is claiming discrimination after being prohibited from boarding a city bus with


In this instance, I believe China has the right idea... They're onto something good with a one-child policy.
Do you have any children?
ReplyDelete